🔗 Share this article

Iturns out he was able to withstand defeat by Grimsby. He weathered losing a crucial continental showpiece versus one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive home defeats against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, an unwavering system, squandering the team's most promising academy products, the 32% win rate, calling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to dance. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. The most casual observer will notice the paradoxical situation: a coach who often railed at his players for failing in one-on-one duels crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most feared sporting directors.

And frankly, this whole painful saga appears to portray the director in a different perspective. It may have been easy, given his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to regard Jason Wilcox as little more than a functionary within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong everyone was. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the hapless Dan Ashworth earlier, he has demonstrated as one of the sport’s true generals: a tactical intellect that United’s mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

A Strategic Clash Regarding Formation and Philosophy

To illustrate, it was the director , after having been part of the leadership that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach in the first place, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas were resisted. However, such directives carry more weight when issued by a man of a man the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, holder of three England caps and a role in a championship team decades past.

Maybe eventually Jason Wilcox might agree to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is departing with full compensation, with no penalty clause in place. The director speaks rarely publicly, and with very good reason. The real thinkers of this sport – men like him – simply operate at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not quite the same as being prepared to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Power Behind Command

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the directives of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his preference for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for United to adopt analytics and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting early in his minority ownership, he declared that the team's approach to football “shall be determined in this room”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is an expert in these intricate footballing stuff, drawing from his previous experience in industry and sailing. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, strategically brilliant, simply superior. Whom else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of austerity, the building of a new stadium that appears similar to an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Football Hierarchy: Executives Over Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing in top-tier football. Historically, teams mistakenly delegated major sporting choices to subordinate staff like managers, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for a young, innovative manager with a philosophy and energy to join an organization and see their vision supported to fruition. Yet how many businesses have these guys established? How many mass redundancies have they managed? Better by far to place genuine authority where it belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the strategy by the directors and appoint a coach who can tailor their methods accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the product, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of literal children into Europe and wins two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic finds his standing damaged while the people who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.

The Neoliberal Game: Responsibility Only for the Few

And perhaps in a small way this represents corporate governance in action: the rise of a gilded elite who are infallible, whose choices are always sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach only to fire him for using too much that system. Bring in the project manager and then discard them for taking too long. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new player acquisitions, for the fact that the adults – however well qualified – are in charge.